Featured, Galleries, PC, Platforms, Xbox One

Titanfall Beta Xbox One vs PC Max Settings Direct Feed Screenshot Comparison: PC Wins, but not by Much

by on February 14, 2014 9:58 AM 142

The beta version of Titanfall has been released on both PC and Xbox One, and there isn’t any non disclosure agreement or similar gag order in place, meaning that Respawn Entertainment is quite confident in the product’s quality, and that we’re free to compare the two versions down to the pixel.

The superiority of the PC version is to be expected, considering that it’s supposed to run on machines with more raw power compared to consoles (even if the beta is definitely scalable, meaning that it can probably run pretty well even on old rigs with lowered detail), but just how much better does it look?

The screenshot comparison below aims to show exactly that. Each Xbox One screenshot was captured directly from the console, and each PC screenshot was captured via Fraps. All screenshots were saved in lossless PNG format to achieve maximum fidelity. Of course to fully appreciate the differences you should click on each screenshot to enlarge it, then you can easily flip between tabs to compare them.

The PC version was running at maximum settings, 1920 x 1080 resolution and 4x MSAA.

Titanfall_01_PC Titanfall_01_XboxOne

Since this screenshot’s angle is almost perfectly matched, we also made an animated GIF (you can click on the picture below to see it) automatically switching between versions.

Titanfall_01_animated

TitanFall_02_PC Titanfall_02_XboxOne

Titanfall_03_PC Titanfall_03_XboxOne

Titanfall_04_PC Titanfall_04_XboxOne

Titanfall_05_PC Titanfall_05_XboxOne

Titanfall_06_PC Titanfall_06_XboxOne

Titanfall_07_PC Titanfall_07_XboxOne

Titanfall_08_PC Titanfall_08_XboxOne

Titanfall_09_PC Titanfall_09_XboxOne

Titanfall_10_PC Titanfall_10_XboxOne

The screenshots above show a visible (and predictable) difference between the two versions of the game. What wasn’t expected is that said difference isn’t as big as many thought. The Xbox One version is obviously much weaker in resolution, and shows a very visible aliasing on the edges: you could seriously cut a loaf of bread with those jaggies.

Texture resolution seems to be similar in most areas, but the Xbox One version appears to have lower resolution normal maps that cause faux 3D details to look a little rougher. It’s also visibly oversharpened and blacks seem a bit more crushed.

Another visible difference is in the distance LODs. The discrepancy between the two versions increases quite noticeably on objects far away from the camera.

Other than that, the two versions are surprisingly similar in most aspects. The difference is visible, but not excessively relevant.

As a side note, the PC version was tested on a rig with an AMD Phenom 2 X4 965 Black Edition overclocked to 3.8 Ghz, an overclocked Nvidia Geforce GTX 660 2 GB, and 8B GB RAM. It held 60 FPS in a very stable fashion at the settings described above. As a matter of fact it was way too stable, as the game seems to be limited to 60 fps even with V-Sync deactivated. If you’re looking for a game that will juice every drop of power from your $3000 gaming PC, Titanfall is not that game, at least in its beta incarnation.

Graphics aside, Titanfall is a blast, fast and fun, unless you’re strolling around taking screenshots of course. I guess I provided quite a few easy targets today.

Join the Discussion

  • aeris bueller

    pc doesn’t look much better, because it’s a weak looking game that doesn’t take advantage of modern PCs

    • http://www.joystiq.com/ stopshortorgolong

      It’s no visual stunner that’s for sure.

    • madbads

      True, if they only wanted they could make PC version 20+++ times more better , but that was not their goal, and then some people online think if games look so similar XBOX must be as strong as 1k+ $ gaming PC , which is not the case for sure. Or other case when people think PC is barely holding to consoles.

  • dirkradke

    The differences are so small that in actual game play it is doubtful anyone would even notice it. The immersion factor is the same, which is the point of good graphics. While the comparisons are interesting and demonstrate how far a gaming console has come to be like a PC I think the only people who will truly care are those individuals who want the PC or the XB1 to better or worse, because that is there platform of choice.

    • Averix

      Agree 100%. I’m impressed they look so close. For me, the benefit of playing from my couch with a wireless controller on a 60″ screen vs 3ft from a 27″ PC monitor makes this an easy choice.

      • dirkradke

        Of course my HDTV had HDMI, DVI, VGA, and Component Input/Output options. My HDTV is the display I use for my gaming console and PC.

        • Averix

          Sorry, my PC isn’t attached to a TV. A television across the room is a terrible display for typing and reading. Writing code that way is painful to say the least. I’m not going to spend money for two computers to attach one to a TV when a TV centric console can fill the gaming niche better anyway.

          • dirkradke

            I suppose I agree with you, but it just happened I put my gaming console and PC next to each other so I don’t need a PC monitor at all.

          • Aricketts

            It’s not bad when your TV is in the same room as your PC. When you want to use the TV just plug in an HDMI cable and kick back and relax

          • Andrew Harper

            Wtf its called streaming. Are you living in the 90s? You’re acting like its hard to stream crap to your TV from your computer or even just run a long ads hdmi cable and you could have the display on both. Write your code and extend the screen and use it to play Hulu or something lol. Its so much easier than you’re thinking it is.

          • Averix

            Streaming has lag. And running an HDMI cable from one end of the house to the other isn’t really practical. Thanks for the suggestions and the attitude.

          • Andrew Harper

            Put the computer beside one TV, then stream to other TV’s in the house. Use the main connected for gaming. Easy as cake. There is virtually no lag unless you plan on playing the games on the other TV’s. This just gives you the convenience of using your computer for movies and such throughout the house assuming you have a wireless keyboard (20-40 bucks rechargeable battery last four months per charge). If you want to use your monitor and its in the same room as your TV, you can use a dongle or there are wireless receivers that are good enough to allow for gaming in the same room with minimal lag. There are limitless things you can do with or without wires now. You are just putting the limits on.

      • Bose321

        How are you impressed? It’s obviously not a good looking game, therefore even a potato can run it.

        > Implying you can’t play games on a PC with a wireless controller on a 60″ TV. But yeah, sitting near a 1440P 27″ Dell monitor sounds a lot better.

        • Dirty Sanchez

          On that xbox hatorade!!!!

        • b00mfargl3

          Honestly I think it looks great. It does not have to be the best looking game in history for it to be amazing. The visuals are sharp but and the gameplay is great, but If a potato can play that then sell me a f*cking potato if it plays titanfall.

      • Trygg Geoog

        Agreed, sitting 3 ft away with better textures and a 27″ 1440P Monitor and keyboard mouse (lol thumbstick aiming) does make this an easy choice.

      • Alex

        Where do console gamers get this info. I have my computer hooked up to 3 monitors on my desk and a 120 inch 1080p projector ( all at the same time if I wanted). I assire you my Pc can plug into anythong tje PS4 or xbone can. All it takes is the click of one button to switch what display I am using. Not to mention using an xbox or ps4 controller is as easy as plugging it in. Or you can just use it wireless…Stop spreading misinformation.

        • b00mfargl3

          Isn’t knowing all that enough rather than ranting about it. My PC is awesome and can easily out perform my ps4 and my xbox one and I know that, but everyone loves platforms of different choices for different reasons. You already know and I agree with what you say, but isn’t just knowing enough.

      • thenoikz

        Do you need a hand plugging your PC in to a TV? HDMI goes in here, and here. All done.

    • mikeslemonadeFromN4G

      The both look mediocre. It’s the actual game that isn’t that great. Problem is the developer is small and they’re using a the weak Source engine.

      • http://www.joystiq.com/ stopshortorgolong

        Ha I laugh. You’ve been bragging up your PC so much lately and now comparison screens come out and the X1 actually looks better here and you say ah, the game’s not that great anyhow. PC gamers are hilarious.

        • datdude

          Hmmmm..so if the game is graphically underwhelming you’re blaming the pc and not the developer? You’re a strange one. Microsoft ran all the E3 demos on high end pc’s but when the console launched and those same title s had to run on an actual xbone the graphics were woefully short of what had been presented at E3. Titanfall has not been optimized for pc. I’m not sure what they’ve done with this title. It better be fun to play because it really isn’t graphically impressive at all, and considering it’s multiplayer only with limited player count and non destructible environments it’s a little shocking it doesn’t look better.

          • http://www.joystiq.com/ stopshortorgolong

            What’s your point? PC gamers keep bashing consoles and my point is if it wasn’t for consoles there would be no Titanfalls or Watchdogs, Division, Borderlands. Where do PC gamers think the funding comes from for AAA titles? Not from 3-4 million copies of PC sales on a title that’s for sure. All platforms are relevant, good points and bad. Huge sales numbers benefits all gamers and if Titanfall sells ten million combined on xbox and PC then we’ll see a much better Titanfall 2 with a decent graphic engine, not a really old Source engine.

          • Aricketts

            It actually doesn’t look better on Xbox. They’re very close but you can definitely see the jaggies on the Xbox version versus the PC, .

          • PCS4-Box U

            You do know PC is the largest gaming demographic right?

          • datdude

            Pc is not the largest gaming demographic. Not by a long shot. Are you sick in the head guy? Do you need me to call an ambulance for you?

          • PCS4-Box U
          • datdude

            Do you have a point or do you just post things to make yourself feel better? I still don’t understand how you claim pc is the largest gaming demographic when it is clearly not even close. Stop the nonsense.

          • PCS4-Box U

            yes, vindication does make me feel pretty good actually. Regardless, its the largest demographic because everyone has one. Microsoft sold over 200 million copies of Windows7 alone and another 100 million copies of Windows 8, thats a very large potential audience. Whether they play facebook games, browser games, steam, solitaire or whatever, they are potentially part of the demographic.
            Me personally, i play on everything but my PS4 is getting the most attention at the moment.

          • datdude

            Again, you are monumentally confused. Just because people own pc’s, doesn’t mean those people play games on their pc’s, or want to play games on their pc’s. The percentage of people that game on their pc’s compared to ownership is very small. The vast majority of those folks will never play a game on a pc. That is in direct contrast to console utilization. Show some discernment.

          • PCS4-Box U

            Just keep making basless comments with no facts and presenting it like truth. U do realize Steam holds the record for most concurrent users playing at 1 time on any platform? I’m bored with your stupidity so Google off yourself, I couldn’t possibly care any less.

          • datdude

            Wow, this guy really is confused. Good luck with that. There really is no help for your kind. Your confusion is not my concern.

          • Jessie Bristol

            Two games were run on PC from Microsoft (I mean, published by Microsoft), Dead Rising 3 and LocoCycle. The rest were running on Xbox One, Battlefield 4 was running on a PC as well but that was EA’s choice.

          • aeris bueller
          • PCS4-Box U

            THIS!!!^^^
            OMG, finally! Someone else that noticecd, i played Forza 5 and I couldn’t beleive how ugly it was! No thank you. Microsoft should be sued for this.

          • datdude

            Sure you’re right. Because you say it, it must be true. All it takes is a google search to show your comments are misguided. Look it up and see for yourself. E3. 2013. Nvidia GE Force 700 series graphics cards. Every. Single. Game. They. Showed. At. E3. 2013. That should help you resolve your monumental confusion.

        • Bose321

          The irony. This game does not look any good. You console gamers are hilarious.

          • Sobekflakmonkey

            Hey man, I play on consoles as well as PC and even I know this game looks horrible graphically..

        • PCS4-Box U

          The X1 version does not look better but they are reasonably close. That said, it doens’t look very graphic intensive either. The framerate would be the deciding factor here, what is it on Xb1?

        • Vulcanproject

          What, you think the Xbox One version looks better? LOL

          I would say they are close, but on assets, PC edges it. For example, just look at the top of the tank and the higher quality lighting effect on the PC version. PC has slightly more refined shadows and lighting. SLIGHTLY.

          It is however, a tiny difference asset wise.

          What ISN’T a tiny difference, is that Xbox One manages a mere 1408 x 792 resolution, 2 x MSAA, and doesn’t stay locked to 60FPS.

          An Nvidia 650ti 2GB can double that resolution to 1920 x 1080, have 4 x MSAA and exceed 60FPS. Mad when you realise that is just a $140 or so card.

          Anything better than that is just showing off. A GTX670 can do 2560 x 1440 comfortably! Only 3 times (THREE!!) Xbox One’s rez then….and this is only the start of the friggin console generation and a GTX670 isn’t even top spec gear!

          Just enjoy the game. No arguing about this PC v Xbox One graphics debate, because Xbox One isn’t even at the races against a cheapass midrange card

      • dirkradke

        They look fine to me, but it isn’t a type of game I would get into anyway.

        • PCS4-Box U

          Your telling me that you can’t tell the graphic disparity in those pics??? Are you blind???

          • dirkradke

            I’m saying the graphic disparity is irrelevant to me because both games would handle the immersion factor just fine. Both version get the job done for a tactical shooter and I really didn’t notice very many differences – certainly not enough to matter to me.

      • Daniel Lawson

        the game is awesome

    • aeris bueller

      Consoles aren’t close to being like a PC. Here’s an example of a realtime demo on pc: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kr2oHPSJ0m8

      • http://www.joystiq.com/ stopshortorgolong

        Tech demo’s mean squat and if you don’t think the PS4 and X1 can’t look great using Unreal 4 you’re dreaming.

        • aeris bueller

          unreal 4 demo for ps4 vs pc on youtube, and there’s already a huge gap. There’s no way the above demo would look like even close to that even on a ps4, let alone xbox one. PS4 can do some really awesome looking things, but a high end graphics card or cpu costs much more than the entire ps4. Having a closed console system adds a bit of bang for your buck, but there’s no comparison to a high end PC. It’s in a completely different class. Saying that consoles are approaching gaming PCs is just completely inaccurate.

          • PCS4-Box U

            Well its a compressed you tube video so it really doesn’t do it justice but yes, a high end PC (which i have also), will always out-perform a console. The sky is the limit with PC but it also has its drawbacks (rampant cheating, hackers, easy of use, more cheaters and hackers, exclusive, etc.)The only solution is to own them all.. except the XBO, nobody should by that lie Microsoft is selling.

        • Bose321

          They mean everything.

      • dirkradke

        So what? I can’t run it any way on my PC and if I want to play the game without worrying about whether I can play the game I use a console. And please don’t give me all the crap about PCs being better – I don’t care.

        • aeris bueller

          You’re perfectly welcome to do so. I was responding to a comment saying that consoles are approaching PC powerwise, and I thought the statement was inaccurate.

          • dirkradke

            Depends on how you look at it I suppose. Both the PS4 and XB1 use the x86 architecture with off the shelf components for memory, Blu-Ray drive, and graphics chips. Those same exact graphics chips will be available by the end of the month from AMD in the form of a graphics add-on card for your PC. In addition the operating system for the PS4 called ORBIS is based on a version of FreeBSD Linux, and the operating system for the XB1 is based on the Windows 8 kernel. The PS3 and 360 had probably 50% or more of the components similar to a PC. The PS4 and XB1 are probably at 75% or more.

          • PiratesCanDIAF

            “PS4 called ORBIS is based on a version of FreeBSD Linux,”

            LOL You are clueless

          • Daniel Lawson

            I thought FreeBSD was Unix based OS

          • PiratesCanDIAF

            It is but it is very different from GNU/Linux. Especially if you try managing or coding for them.

          • dirkradke

            LINUX is noted for being the first version of the Kernel to be ported (recompiled) for Intel (x86) based processors by Linux Torvalds in 1991. PlayStation used his idea to do the same thing. All they had to do was recompile the Kernel for different versions of the Cell processor and then the Intel/AMD based x86 architecture. — http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux

          • PiratesCanDIAF

            Thanks for quoting Wikipedia. But the fact remains they are very different if you have actually used them. Both internally and in the userland. Please stop, you are making your self look more like an idiot with every reply.

          • dirkradke

            Everything I have commented on is accurate and your comment about how different they are doesn’t invalidate or even address my comments. You quoted me and told me I’m clueless, but the fact is I’m also right. You can check yourself. Developers for both systems have already said the same things.

          • PiratesCanDIAF

            1) PS4 does not run anything Linux. (The part I quoted you on)

            2) Porting an OS to another platform is not as simple as recompiling it

            3) As someone who codes on both platforms, I say they are very different. you have to hope they do not make any syscalls or now systemd or upstart calls(ie cgroups, udev, etc do not work on FreeBSD)

            4) And for that story you linked it states ” FreeBSD is a free version of BSD Unix that is generally fairly compatible with most Linux applications” which is very misleading as you have to load a kernel module into the BSD kernel to enable support for ELF binaries then you have to install a full linux userland(Which IIRC on FreeBSD this is based off of SUSE 9). and even then it is very flaky. That is for closed source software

            So no, you have not been accurate and hardly right.

          • dirkradke

            1) I never said it PS4 ran Linux I said it ran a version of FreeBSD based on version 9.0, which you said I was clueless on. I provided you with where I found the information and you still disagreed with me.

            2) I know exactly what porting is and does. I am also a programmer and know porting is not recompiling, but the only recompiling a mentioned was in relation to Linus Torvalds and LINUX.

            3) The platforms may be very different, but I was comparing it to past versions. Compared to the PS3/360 both now have similar architecture and chipsets basically from the same manufacturer. That is indisputable. In addition developers said it is now easier to port from 1 platform to another precisely because of the similarities compared to past incarnations of the gaming console.

            4) FreeBSD was originally based on UNIX and now they have versions based on both the work done in UNIX and LINUX. FreeBSD 9.0 is based on UNIX not SUSE. The codename ORBIS was what originally used for the PS3 O.S. development and the PS4 still uses this same architecture. I believe FreeBSD 10.0 is based SUSE, but haven’t checked.

            So no, I don’t agree with you when you say I have not been accurate or hardly right. However, if you want I can agree to disagree and move on?

          • PiratesCanDIAF

            1) You said, and I quote “PS4 called ORBIS is based on a version of FreeBSD Linux,” ie you called FreeBSD Linux.

            2) You said “Kernel to be ported (recompiled) for Intel (x86)”

            3) When I used the term platform I was not referring architecture.

            4) I never said FreeBSD was based on SUSE9, just that you can enable ABI with SUSE9. Which they have updated to Fedora 10 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/linuxemu-lbc-install.html

            Again, yes you have not been accurate.

          • dirkradke

            Well, at this point I don’t really care. Accurate or not I don’t agree with you.

          • dirkradke

            FreeBSD – BSD stands for Berkley Software Development. Basically, the University of California at Berkley wrote this version of UNIX. In addition to that the PS4 operating system is based on version 9 of FreeBSD. Before the PS3 & 4 the codename was ORBIS so they could try and development the operating system without leaking anything. Not sure if it’s still used officially by Sony. The very first paragraph talks about it in this article — http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/159476-ps4-runs-orbis-os-a-modified-version-of-freebsd-thats-similar-to-linux

          • dirkradke

            The very first paragraph mentions it. There is also Japanese psychology wrapped up into the name — http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/159476-ps4-runs-orbis-os-a-modified-version-of-freebsd-thats-similar-to-linux

        • Bose321

          The fact that you do not care shows the ignorance and stupidity of console gamers.

          • dirkradke

            The only ignorance being shown is an intolerance for accepting another persons choice on where and how they want to play video games. What I don’t care about is the whole argument of what is better. I have my preferred system and you have yours. The fact that you feel threatened enough to try and insult or put a label on an entire group of people only shows your insecurity and/or ignorance.

          • Bose321

            Cute.

          • dirkradke

            I thought so.

      • DrunkwitPowah

        That’s a tech demo you moron. Show me where I can download and play this game right now.

    • qqq

      Indeed, the xbox one shows how far a console has come :) Running a game made with the ten year old Source engine. They look the same because no one bothered to upgrade the PC version. They made a single version of the game and put it on all systems

    • madbads

      well, pc sure look bit cleaner for the eye and will sure be more stable fps wise.. But , not by much as the tittle says. Average dude enjoyment will be 99% the same.

    • Lambda_Physicist

      It’s running on the Source Engine, anything can run that.

  • Temjin001

    Asset wise they look very similar. The differences in res become very apparent when clicking into the exploded higher-res image. One way or another Titanfall isn’t a tech showcase title.

    The game still looks like a lot of fun and I’d like to try it out.

    and as a side note, that AMD PC test version looks to be running on a less-than-$1000 gaming rig. The GTX 660 2GB is a budget-mid-grade card. 8GB of RAM can be found in cereal boxes and AMD processors are generally inexpensive.

    • madbads

      Tell you what, thats about 450-550$ PC atm and will get even lower.

      • Daniel Lawson

        that’s a sub 400 machine

  • DrunkwitPowah

    Jesus…the jaggies in the Xbone version are just pathetic.

    • spideynut71

      Your Fony Fanboyism is pathetic.

      • http://www.joystiq.com/ stopshortorgolong

        Jealousy spidey….that’s all.

        • spideynut71

          LOL….jealous of what, exactly? I returned my launch-day PS4 without opening it, because there was still no info/announcement for either LBP3 or Uncharted 4….and Gamestop had to give me a shltty AC:BF bundle, because Watchdogs was delayed (I don’t care for the AC games). When there are games I care about, I have over $500 on a Gamestop giftcard (from the return) to re-buy a PS4.

          I also have my custom built PC rig, which annihilates anything ANY of the new consoles will EVER be able to do.

          I only buy the consoles for true exclusives….that I care about. I love the DR games, as well as Forza, so I kept my X1 ; otherwise, I’d have returned it too, since most of it’s exclusives are so far from release.

          • Bankai

            Stop lying, you never had a PS4. You’re a Microsheep through and through, so we all know you can’t touch a PS4 without getting burned.

          • spideynut71

            Well, I’ve got a receipt and Gamestop giftcard that says otherwise. So, I’ll own another sometime this year, and still have my X1 and PC gaming rig, so I’ll be playing exclusives for ALL platforms. But you go ahead and enjoy your 1 little console, since that’s obviously all your family can afford. :/

          • Psionicinversion

            ooo hope Bankai’s got some aloe vera, cus he just got burned

      • Bose321

        Do you enjoy those jaggies?

        • spideynut71

          You don’t see them when you’re actually playing the game, you ignorant shlt ; this isn’t the PS2 era. But if that wasn’t the case, I’d just play the PC version, since I built my rig to play ANYTHING at max settings.

          • Bose321

            > Not PS2 era
            > Jaggies
            k. Enjoy your jaggies though.

          • spideynut71

            Wow…you’ve taken the definition of a retarded fanboy to new heights. Enjoy your ignorance though.

          • Bose321

            Cute. U jaggy bro?

          • spideynut71

            Nope. U faggy tho. :)

            Keep trying though…you’re only proving my point. ;)

          • Bose321

            Jaggies really get you upset, don’t they? But go ahead and insult your own though… you’re only proving my point. ;)

        • Daniel Lawson

          I enjoyed the game… it’s lived up to all of it’s hype and then some

      • aeris bueller

        it’s true though. The jaggies are pathetic, especially for such a graphically crappy game.

        • spideynut71

          Like I said in another comment, you won’t see them when you’re actually playing the game….especially since it’s so fast-paced. But my PC won’t break a sweat playing this at max settings, so I’m good either way. :)

          • hurdur

            actually, jaggies tend to be more noticable when in motion :/

          • spideynut71

            You are an idiot, if you really believe that.

          • hurdur

            holy crap, you’re right :)
            what a stupid thing to say
            lets mail every developper that they have to stop implementing anti aliasing in their games since people don’t notice jaggies when they move
            brilliant
            are you blind?

      • Bankai

        Nah, he’s right and the only pathetic one around here is you, you little Microsheep.

      • PCS4-Box U

        Defensive much?

      • DrunkwitPowah

        Oh I’m a proud Sony fanboy there’s no denying that but there’s no denying the jaggies in that pic…well unless you’re an idiot xbot of course.

        • s3ltzer

          XBoners are in denial…

      • You are flat out wrong

        >Identify jaggies
        >”hurr durr u r pony”

        And you’re an Xbox cretin. Your point?

      • darren evans

        Hes a fanboy because he identified poor visuals? i think you need to sit down and have a think.

        • s3ltzer

          Exactly.

    • Daniel Lawson

      play games not graphics

      • s3ltzer

        True…with the XBO you can’t have both worlds….gotta have “trade-offs”.

  • klarax

    i got a beta key for pc, how do i play ?

    • Jorge Jimenez

      I’d try to redeem in ORIGIN since its an EA game.

      • klarax

        cheers will look now..

  • Mallavol

    I’m hoping Microsoft will fix Xbox One 1080p upscaler, jaggies are everywhere.

  • kevin

    I say thrash the PC version and let those eliste tool suffer along with PS 4 owners and let the play their glorified Indies.

    • Bose321

      Bullshit comment is bullshit.

      • kevin

        No true feelings love Japanese from Nintendo., it’s rich culture , foods . Just hate that company with a disdain. Not BS.

    • hurdur

      I say thrash the xbox version, both of them
      why ruin a good game by making it run sub 60 fps and at 792p (what kind of res is that anyway?)
      at least a ps4 version would probably be able to run at 1080p

      • kevin

        I don’t care about what it’s running or it frames I just don’t want to see on that console.

      • darren evans

        I agree as even 900p looks poor. 1080p was a standard and has been for around 6 years at least for pc games. The standard gaming res soon will be 1440p/4k yet xbox one cant do 1080p lol.

      • shinitaru

        its a FPS, it belongs on the PC where gamers actually hit their target without all that sloppy console controller aim assist crap.

    • Bankai

      PS4 owners are suffering?

      • kevin

        Their whining like a bunch of Little b………

        • Jecht_Sin

          You misspelled “winning”. :D

      • Daniel Lawson

        I haven’t played my PS4 in a week… waiting on second son truthfully

    • darren evans

      If it wasnt for pc you wouldnt have any games to play on your xbox. You need to realise that the xbox one is rubbish and is struggling to play games and cant output to 1080p,big problem. What about when graphics become next gen? Its going to be a laugh to see how witcher 3 turns out for you. Xbox one has no future if its struggling already.

      • kevin

        Thats alright if it struggles and fails then gaming is a hobby I will be walking away from without any hesitation.

  • XXX

    Wow, the Xbox One version looks very nice indeed :)

  • Nick TwinkleToes Setzer

    With 60fps the differences in the two would never be noticable, i can barely tell on a 60″ screen with single still frames. Also, i’m not seeing these horrible jaggies especially considerinh the beta is 2xmsaa pretty sure you are just trying to see more than is really there.

    • darren evans

      Really you need to google 60 fps and realise its just about smooth fast scenes, not graphics.

  • da Boss

    The X1 version looks really jagged, i hope they fix that before launch.

  • Dennis Crosby

    The full game will have better graphics for both but this game wasn’t intended to be a superior graphics game . Its about fun . It that type of game where good fps player and casual player can both play and enjoy themselves. Everyone who plays the game has a giant smile on there faces. Repawns has done something that call of duty and battlefield both have lost. Making games fun

    • You are flat out wrong

      Race to the bottom garbage, then?

      EA continues its long-running streak as the cancer of the industry.

    • darren evans

      The final game will not have better graphics as the game design is done. You are right it is about fun but the graphics are not next gen. Because of xbox one they had to make the game with 6 bots each side as it is struggling to play it properly which is terrible. Im playing the beta and its a big shame.

  • Grim
    • Jecht_Sin

      Get out of here. I don’t want more FPS junk infesting the PS4! :p

      • Daniel Lawson

        is that how you cope?

  • PCS4-Box U

    Whats the frame rate on the XBO version right now?

    • Daniel Lawson

      I couldn’t detect any dropped frames even in the heat of a 5 on 5 titan brawl

  • http://Wccftech.com/author/fahadarif Fahad Arif

    No matter how high the graphics are, the game looks ugly to me.

  • WellWisher

    I have a feeling this game is going to be like that girl that looks pretty average but does everything I want in bed.

  • Jecht_Sin

    I’ve got a feeling that on X360 it won’t look much different either. Just at the slightly lower (compared to Xbone) 720p resolution. ^_^

    • Daniel Lawson

      when will it get through you skull that screen resolution has very little to do with graphics… it’s texture resolution that matters and it’s what makes the different especially on the PC LOD

      • darren evans

        No just no. You dont talk to somebody like that especially when you are wrong. What is the point in high resolution textures if you dont have a resolution high enough to show them? 1080p is the standard for games as it looks a damn sight better than 720p, i mean the difference is huge.

  • darren evans

    Fanboys on here are rediculous. They come on here which is about graphics then say graphics dont matter, WHAT? Im playing the beta on pc and yes the graphics are terrible, a lot better than xbox one but still. The game is quite fun but i dont think that will last because of the bots. From what i seen on here the xbox community is disgraceful. All they do is try to defend their platform instead of admitting they made a big mistake.

    • coip

      Come March 11 when they’re playing Titanfall and their PS4 friends are not, I don’t think any of them will be thinking they “made a big mistake” (more l ikely, their PS4 friends will think that). And certainly they don’t think that now, with way more and way better exclusives on Xbox One than on PS4: Dead Rising 3, Killer Instinct, Forza 5, Ryse, Peggle 2, Max: Curse of Brotherhood, Halo: Spartan Assault, etc. vs. Knack and Killzone.

      If you’re going to reply something about “brah, PC!”, don’t bother. Most console gamers aren’t interested in PC gaming, so making that comparison is just a waste of everyone’s time.

  • FLYFX

    I wish they would release the game with extra textures for the PC because it shameful a game this awesome looks so dated in that department.

  • Mike H

    The game runs on Xbox 360 of course it will have near identical graphics on XB1 and PC….

Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus